Hyperstar first Light - Part 2 Narrowband Imaging

-

One of the main open questions when buying a Hyperstar was how it would work with L-eXtreme dual narrowband filter. At f/2.2 the light will no longer be mostly parallel to the optical axis,but will pass the filter at comparably high angles. This will lead to a downward shift in the filter transmission wavelengths. There are filters that are specifically designed to compensate, others just have wider transmission windows to be less sensitive for that effect. However, as these filters aren’t cheap, I wanted to see what I can do with my L-eXxtreme first.

Results published by other amateur astronomers vary from "the filter is completely useless at f/2" to "among my many filters the L-eXtreme is the best with my Hyperstar". Apparently, there is a bit of variability in the spectral transmission curve between the individual filter specimens.

In my second night of testing the Hyperstar I therefore took a number of images using the filter.






As there was rain forecasted in the 2nd half of that night I went with lower exposure times compared to the unfiltered images on the previous day. However, I still liked the results. Clearly my specimen of the L-eXtreme filter at least isn’t in the "completely useless with the Hyperstar" category.

In order to assess this a bit further I compared a detail of  NGC6992 with the same detail in the unfiltered data (using the same number of frames as a basis). 

Detail of NGC6992 taken with the L-eXtreme filter

The same Detail taken at full spectrum

In direct comparison perhaps the H-alpha could pop out a bit more in the filtered image, we may be getting only part of the signal there. However, the fine details are very similar, if you compare the images no features are missing. So my conclusion for now is that the filter is absolutely worth using with the Hyperstar,  e.g. if Moonlight would limit capturing images otherwise. 








Popular posts from this blog

Controlling the Telescope with a Berry

-
Image
One of the things that made me reluctant to seriously start with astrophotography was the prospect of spending long nights outside in front of a laptop that is tied to the telescope with a long USB cable. Nights that would typically end in disappointment and anger after I inadvertently tripped over that cable - at least that had been my experience in some early attempts.   This time I wanted to take a different approach. The entire setup should be controlled by a little computer that is directly attached to the equipment, while the control would happen remotely over the network.  I guess there are three main technical approaches that you can take to achieve this: mini-pc being controlled over remote desktop; basically using ascom and a similar imaging software as you would use in the "long USB" scenario.  "out of the box" solution from an astronomy equipment vendor like the ASIair Linux based solution using Kstars/Ekos/Indi running e.g. on a Rasperry Pi I am not sur
Read more

December Nebulae - fighting star halos

-
Image
The Horsehead Nebula is almost a mandatory mandatory object to capture with every new optics. I was eager to see how the Hyperstar world do with it. Unfortunately weather and moon were not quite supportive of this plan. As even thin clouds lead to huge halos around the bright star(s) I had to discard quite a number of frames. Luckily over Christmas it was possible to collect a decent amount of data in reasonable quality. IC434 the Horsehead Nebula 152x60sec, C9 Hyperstar, ASI294Pro IC443 the Jellyfish Nebula is quite a beautiful object. However, the original frame I chose contained two relatively bright stars and the Optolong filter is creating a gigantic halo around them - one was even able to the cabling of the Hyperstar within the halo. My PixInsight craftsmanship proved insufficient to fully fix that, so I tried to tame one of the halos and cropped the image to remove the 2nd one. IC443 Jellyfish Nebula 117x120sec, C9 Hyperstar, Optolog L-eXtreme, ASI294Pro Shot at the same nights
Read more

Galaxies at a larger scale

-
Image
The primary focus of the C9.25 at 2350mm in combination with the sensor size of my ASI 294 is giving a field of view that turned out to be a nice fit for imaging most of the spring galaxies.   However, there are a number of objects that do not quite fit. So I spent a few nights end of April to image a with the 1/6.3 reducer. This is giving a slightly larger field of view. More suitable for some of the larger objects. In addition to the larger galaxies I tried some groups of galaxies. Here it was a bit harder to get a good fit. HCG 44 may actually be better without the reducer. The famous Leo triplet is too big to fit within the FOV - so I captured only two of them. I think they are beautiful - even as a pair.  For the really huge galaxies - like e.g. the Andromeda galaxy - as well as the large scale galaxy groups even shorter focal lengths would be required. I still need to find a good solution for that. In the meantime I enjoy how these medium sized objects turned out.
Read more